Compare lab software options

Three comparisons against the three things Indian labs actually use today. Each one starts with what the alternative does well, carries at least one row where this system loses, and ends with a switching checklist that is manual from the first step to the last.

The three comparisons

Pick the one that describes how your lab reports today.

Word and Excel

Most small labs in India still type reports in Word and keep the register in Excel, and it works: the layout is exactly what the pathologist wants and nobody needs training. What it cannot do is check itself. Nothing tells you a haemoglobin is below the range for a woman, nothing stops two patients getting the same case number, and nothing proves who changed a value after it was printed. Here is the trade, in both directions.

12 rows compared, 0 of them lost, and an eight-step manual checklist.

Offline lab software

Installed lab software is the default for a reason: it is fast, it runs when the line is down, and the data sits on a machine in the room. The costs show up later, when the lab opens a second branch, when the reporting computer dies, or when the owner wants to see the day’s collections from somewhere else. This page is about where a hosted system wins, and where it plainly does not.

12 rows compared, 0 of them lost, and an eight-step manual checklist.

Other cloud lab software

There are several good hosted lab systems sold in India, and if one of them fits your lab you should buy it. This page is about the differences that are easy to check rather than the ones you have to take on trust: what the format library actually contains, what the analyser wording really means, what a plan costs, and which modules are simply missing here.

10 rows compared, 0 of them lost, and an eight-step manual checklist.

How these pages are written

A comparison that cannot say what the other option is good at is an advertisement.

No product and no company is named. The alternatives are categories, and every sentence about them is hedged accordingly.
Every table carries a row where this system is the worse choice, marked as not available rather than explained away.
Nothing is imported. The checklist says so at the top and again at the last step, because that is the single most expensive surprise in a switch.
Claims about this system link the repository file behind them on the feature pages.

Set up your lab this afternoon.

Create your organisation, add your tests, print the first barcode. If you would rather see it first, ask for a walkthrough.

Start 30-day free trial Book a walkthrough